Showing posts with label George Nicholas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Nicholas. Show all posts

Friday, July 31, 2015

George Nicholas specifies the charges against Gov. Jefferson

George Nicholas to TJ, July 31, 1781: “By the resolution of the House of Delegates an enquiry is to be made into the conduct of the executive for the last twelve months. No particular instance of misconduct was specified. They seemed to think and I am still of opinion that the persons entrusted with the administration ought to be ready to give an account of the whole and of every part of it.
  You consider me in a wrong point of view when you speak of me as an accuser. As a freeman and the representative of free Men I considered it as both my right and duty to call upon the executive to account for our numberless miscarriages and losses so far as they were concerned in or might have prevented them. In doing this I had no private pique to gratify….
  At your request I will mention such things as strike me at present as want[ing] explanation and if any thing shall hereafter occur I will inform you by letter.
  The total want of opposition to Arnold on his first expedition to Richmond.
  The dissolution of a considerable body of militia on our Southern frontier at the time of Green’s retreat for want of orders from the executive.
  The want of timely orders to the counties of Amherst Augusta &c. after the adjournment of the Assembly from Richmond.
  The great loss that the country has sustained in arms &c. exclusive of those destroyed by the enemy.
  The rejection of an offer made by Cols. Campbell Christian and McDowell to raise regiments for the Southern Service.” [PTJ 7:105-106]

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Jefferson responds to George Nicholas's call to account for his administration

Jefferson to George Nicholas, 28 July 1781:
“Sir,
"I am informed that a resolution on your motion passed the House of Delegates requiring me to render account of some part of my administration, without specifying the act to be accounted for. As I suppose that this was done under the impression of some particular instance or instances of ill conduct, and that it could not be intended first, to stab a reputation by a general suggestion under a bare expectation that facts might be afterwards hunted up to bolster it, I hope you will not think me improper in asking the favor of you to specify to me the unfortunate passages in my conduct which you mean to adduce against me, that I may be enabled to prepare to yield obedience to the House while facts are fresh in my memory and witnesses and documents are in existence.
I am Sir
Your most obedt. Servt."

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

Jefferson's answers to the charges of the Virginia Assembly

"1st Objection-- That General Washington's information was, that an embarkation was taking place, destined for this state.

"Answer-- His information was, that it was destined for the southward, as was given out at New York. Had similar informations from General Washington and Congress been considered as sufficient ground at all times for calling the militia into the field, there would have been a standing army of militia kept up; because there has never been a time, since the invasion expected in December 1777, but what we have had those intimations hanging over our heads. The truth is, that General Washington always considered as his duty to convey every rumor of an embarkation; but we (for some time past, at least) never thought anything but actual invasion should induce us to the expense and harassment of calling the militia into the field; except in the case of December 1779, when it was thought proper to do this in order to convince the French of our disposition to protect their ships. Inattention to this necessary economy, in the beginning, went far towards that ruin of our finances which followed.

"2d Objection-- Where were the post-riders established last summer?

"Answer-- They were established at Continental expense, to convey speedy information to Congress of the arrival of the French fleet, then expected here. When that arrived at Rhode Island, these expenses were discontinued. They were again established on the invasion in October, and discontinued when that ceased. And again on the first intimation of the invasion of December. But it will be asked, why were they not established on General Washington's letters? Because those letters were no more than we had received upon many former occasions, and would have led to a perpetual establishment of postriders.

"3d Objection-- If a proper number of men had been put into motion on Monday, for the relief of the lower country, and ordered to march to Williamsburg, that they would at least have been in the neighborhood of Richmond on Thursday. "Answer-- The order could not be till Tuesday, because we then received our first certain information. Half the militia of the counties round about Richmond were then ordered out, and the whole of them on the fourth, and ordered not to wait to come in a body, but in detachments as they could assemble. Yet were there not on Friday more than two hundred collected, and they were principally of the town of Richmond.

"4th Objection-- That we had not signals.

"Answer-- This, though a favorite plan of some gentlemen, and perhaps a practicable one, has hitherto been thought too difficult.

"5th Objection-- That we had not look-outs.

"Answer-- There had been no cause to order look-outs more than has been ever existing. This is only in fact asking why we do not always keep look-outs.

"6th Objection-- That we had not heavy artillery on traveling carriages.

"Answer-- The gentlemen who acted as members of the Board of War a twelve-month can answer this question, by giving the character of the artificers whom, during that time, they could never get to mount the heavy artillery. The same reason prevented their being mounted from May 1780 to December. We have even been unable to get those heavy cannon moved from Cumberland by the whole energy of government. A like difficulty which occurred in the removal of those at South Quay, in their day, will convince them of the possibility of this.

"7th Objection-- That there was not a body of militia thrown into Portsmouth, the Great Bridge, and Suffolk.

"Answer-- In the summer of 1780, we asked the favor of General Nelson, to call together the county lieutenants of the lower counties, and concert the general measures which should be taken for instant opposition, on any invasion, until aid could be ordered by the Executive; and the county lieutenants were ordered to obey his call; he did so the first moment, to wit, on Saturday, December the 31, at eight o'clock, A.M., of our receiving information of the appearance of a fleet in the bay. We asked the favor of General Nelson to go down, which he did, with full powers to call together the militia of any counties he thought proper, to call on the keepers of any public arms or stores, and to adopt for the instant such measures as exigencies required, till we could be better informed.

"Query-- Why were not General Nelson, and the brave officers with him, particularly mentioned?

"Answer-- What should have been said of them? The enemy did not land, nor give them an opportunity of doing what nobody doubts they would have done; that is, something worthy of being minutely recited.

"Query-- Why publish Arnold's letter without General Nelson's answer?

"Answer-- Ask the printer. He got neither from the Executive.

"Objection-- As to the calling out a few militia, and that late.

"Answer-- It is denied that they were few or late. Four thousand and seven hundred men (the number required by Baron Steuben) were called out the moment an invasion was known to have taken place, that is on Tuesday, January 2.

"Objection-- The abandonment of York and Portsmouth fortifications.

"Answer-- How can they be kept without regulars, on the large scale on which they were formed? Would it be approved of to harass the militia with garrisoning them?"

From Marie Kimball, Jefferson, War and Peace, 1776 to 1784, 248-250.

Friday, June 19, 2015

Jefferson learns he is being investigated by the Virginia House of Delegates for misconduct

Archibald Cary
Archibald Cary to Jefferson, 19 June 1781: “You must have heard that Nelson is your successor [as Governor].” Russia and Austria have offered to mediate between the US and Britain.  “At length the Assembly are giving Ample Powers to the Executive. The Bill for that purpose stands for a Committee of the Senate this day and will Pass. It is what that body have long Wished. A Bill has Passed both Houses for establishing Martial Law 20 Miles round both Armys.”

“So Much for Assembly but I must give you one more peice of News respecting your Self. An Address was ready to be offered the Senate to you. What Can you think Stopt it? George Nicholas made a Motion in the Delegates House for an Inquire into your Conduct, a Catalogue of omissions, and other Misconduct. I have not Seen the Particulars. Your Friends Confident an Inquire would do you Honor Seconded the Motion. I presume you will be Serv’d with the order. As this Step was Taken I persuaided Winston not to make his Motion; I had heard something of this Kind was to be brought on the Carpit, and If I know you, it will Give you no pain.” PTJ 7:96-97  

Sunday, June 14, 2015

Ex-Governor Jefferson under fire

For several days after regrouping in Staunton after Tarleton's attack on Charlottesville, the Virginia Assembly continued fruitlessly to issue resolutions to the governor, not realizing that he had relinquished the seat on June 1. On June 12, after electing his successor, the House also voted to conduct “an inquiry into the conduct of the Executive for the past twelve months” to account for the “numberless miscarriages and losses” Virginia had suffered during his administration. This was a particularly insensitive phrase to one whose wife had experienced miscarriages and who had recently lost their third child.

On June 19, Jefferson's friend Archibald Cary, the Speaker of the Senate, caught him up on events in the Virginia legislature. "You must have heard that Nelson is your successor," he reported. Moreover, the House had voted to give "Ample Powers to the Executive"--in other words, to empower a dictator--and the Senate was likely to concur. At last, Cary came to the real point:

So Much for Assembly but I must give you one more peice of News respecting your Self.,,,George Nicholas made a Motion in the Delegates House for an Inquire into your Conduct, a Catalogue of omissions, and other Misconduct. I have not Seen the Particulars. Your Friends Confident an Inquire would do you Honor Seconded the Motion. I presume you will be Serv’d with the order....I had heard something of this Kind was to be brought on the Carpit, and If I know you, it will Give you no pain.
Cary clearly did not know Jefferson. He was stricken by the news, utterly and permanently mortified.  For the rest of his life, he would recall the Assembly's action--which he attributed to the machinations of Patrick Henry--with bitterness and shame.